Polaroid I-2 – The Best Camera They Have Ever Made

41 thoughts on “Polaroid I-2 – The Best Camera They Have Ever Made”

1. Please take this video down. You clearly have never used a Polaroid before. The way she ripped the dark cover off the new pack of film had me flinch. 2:15

2. The price is crazy.

3. It is sort of funny the change in perspective of how a Polaroid is seen nowadays to when I was a kid, I am in my fifties. When I was a kid we used Polaroid to have an instant photo more how people today view and use their digital phone camera’s. To have a pic straight away because back then to develop regular film was too slow and inconvenient. The thing is, what we hated about Polaroid its inconsistency in taking photos, is what people love about them today. It is funny but I suppose it is a reaction against how good digital photos have got that any one can take a great photo, they all the same. I prefer Fujifilm but that is probably cause I am old school where I like a consistency. Although I do like the size of the Polaroid film.

4. Not the best, close tho

5. Only this generation could appreciate a camera and film that even in the 1970s everyone knew was absolute shit and only a novelty. 😂

6. 2:08 "Sensor size"? What the hell are you talking about. Do you call your eyes 'sensors' too?

7. They almost had me not gonna lie until I saw the photos. So you're just paying for it to look fancy with a digital screen and all. If the images came out different it would justify paying more but looking at it you may as well just purchase the cheap one. Your just paying for looks of the camera.

8. Congratulations for getting to do the official how to video for the i2

9. Where is the shop now button on your YouTube film.

10. honestly not a huge fan of the double exposure however instead of using it in an artsy way i think it could be used in a funny way like someone running with a upset look on their face then a toilet layed ontop of that

11. Why do you say in your ad that this is the sharpest lens EVER? These photos are not. How do you want to attract customers if you offer nothing more than what we already know from the past. Pure and expensive marketing and nothing more.

12. Image quality is not enough for this price

13. How does this compare to the sx-70 though aside from the film being used?

14. Is the viewfinder just a window or is it like a digital display like a lot of viewfinders now? thanks!! @moment

15. Very cool, but definitely not worth $600.

16. Amazing camera for the enthusiast. Will buy at the holidays. Can’t wait.

17. So for the 4x price of the cheapest Polaroid camera with 3 pro photographers the photos are still super unreliable and getting a really good pic you still need a lot of luck

18. oh my god this looks beautiful

19. Garbage camera terrible pictures…and very expensive, def not needed any longer, a phone takes better pictures…and besides I'll stick to my Cannon 70d …..

20. The feeling of this camera is nice… the manual control and looks are dope… however the actual photos still lack sharpness, they look like the 90s Polaroid photos. And, even though I love the vintage feeling of it. The price is too high for the quality of these images.

21. okay I am definitely getting this for Christmas !!!

22. I spent a 100 quid on a 20 yo compact camera, takes photos waaay better than these, and has a better Polaroid effect than the Polaroid

23. There's no market for a $600+ camera when most people are content using their phones for photography. If prints are desired, they can be easily obtained. Moreover, one can purchase a Polaroid camera for around $50 to enjoy instant photos. Investing $600 in a Polaroid camera is impractical in 2024, regardless of its quality.

24. What a rip off smh

25. Just gonna wait for the fujifilm version since their instant photos look nicer

26. 02:01 I call bullshit, depth of field doesnt change with frame dimension in absolute sense, it can make a difference if you print on the same dimansion starting from two different format becaus one will be more enlarged, but it works opposite to what you suggest, a medium format would appear sharper so less bokeh

27. The quality of the film isn’t that good to justify the prices I’ve got one in the cupboard and I don’t use it. I’m thinking of taking it out and selling it secondhand.

28. 599$ for a toy camera. Nope

29. Nice video but the photo quality is utter garbage, not worth the price tag IMO

30. Good video, these pictures look amazing.

    But to the camera: The catch of Polaroids was that the cameras were cheap and the film expensive and instant. Now they implemented some of the most basic features that should've been added decades ago and try to convince us it's worth 700€? For that price the comparison to the competiton has to be made and for that price you can get second hand a Sony Alpha 7 body and a decent lens with no additional operating costs. What's the catch of this camera? These photos could've been taken with a 10€ second hand polaroid too. As someone who's a polaroid enthusiast I don't see why I should get this camera when the Now+ does EXACTLY the same but not on device.

31. This is cool… I'm still gonna choose a modded polaroid back for a medium format camera, but its a step in the right direction. I'd also love to see polaroid film with better dynamic range and a touch less highlight bloom. Yeah its the signature Polaroid look, but it can be toned down without losing the Polaroid charm and let that better sharpness come through more.

32. Great video

33. No point releasing this when the film quality is still trash. Sigh.

34. That blonde chick has exactly one pose

35. Yup. Have teenagers review the most advanced instant camera ever made. No thank you.

36. Kai took crap pictures

37. Without knowing the price tag of this camera, I was really excited for it. Like people mentioned, the film holds it back. I was not necessarily awed by the processed images – I felt like you can recreate most shots with a 50 dollar Polaroid off of Ebay. I was more excited that there was a newer Polaroid out. Looked at the price tag and at 600 bucks… I don't know if it's all that worth it. I guess if you have the coin to throw at it, then go on ahead.

38. Meh. Packfilm was way better. RIP FP-100C, ID-UV and the rest.

39. What camera did you use to film this video? The colours are so vibrant and dreamy looking.

40. can you use strobes with this camera?

41. Sensor size?

Comments are closed.